ISAR Global
Intelligence for the AI Governance Age
We provide evidence-based intelligence on international AI governance coordination mechanisms. Tracking governance reality versus governance rhetoric across frameworks worldwide.
What we Provide
Process Intelligence
Monthly tracking of UN AI governance mechanisms, examining who actually influences processes versus who participates. Real-time analysis of coordination effectiveness.
Framework Analysis
Cross-jurisdictional comparison of EU, US, UK, and Commonwealth approaches. Understanding how frameworks interact in practice, not just in policy documents
Implementation Intelligence
Identifying the gap between international governance promises and actual institutional delivery. What coordination mechanisms achieve versus what they claim.
Strategic Briefings
Evidence-based analysis for policymakers navigating multi-jurisdictional complexity. Systematic tracking replacing reactive commentary.
Latest Intelligence
Recent analysis from our governance intelligence work
-
The Velocity Gap: Why AI Governance Will Always Lag Development
When international governance frameworks promise comprehensive AI oversight, observers often respond with scepticism. The European Union’s AI Act took nearly four years from proposal to…
-
Academic Excellence vs Implementation Reality
The credentials are impeccable. The governance experience is remarkably thin.
-
The AI Governance Coordination Paradox: Why More Frameworks Mean Less Coordination
Government officials responsible for AI governance coordination face systematic capacity constraints. Participating meaningfully in forty-plus international processes requires dedicated staff, travel budgets, preparation time, and…
Stay Informed
Receive monthly governance intelligence updates tracking international coordination mechanisms